Search results

This scenario falls apart when you bring players into the mix. Most people aren't stupid and are going to work out fairly quickly where most of the damage is coming from, and ignore the tanks in favour of popping the damage dealing drones.

Get the **** outta my server m8 Edit: Censored the bad word, are you happy now Cru?

Advanced armour won't be good at small sizes, because you'll never layer enough to actually do anything and it weighs a ton. Better off using that mass on thrusters and not get hit in the first place.

You can already deconstruct ships with a shipyard, and add the blocks to a blueprint. Shipyards also have the function to repair from template, but it's somewhat buggy as all hell.

STOLEN!!1!

Yes, proper PvP. As is done by the majority of starmade players. Do you still fail to understand that your suggestion affects the entire game?

This is exactly why you've been getting these responses. By your own admission you don't participate in proper PvP, yet you believe a suggestion that is based on incorrect suppositions should be implemented. How do you not understand that.

Himself.

Optapodamus You keep mentioning warping when shields drop. Exactly how much PvP have you done? There's not some magic 10 second gap where you don't take damage once shields are down, once they're down you're getting holes. And inhibitors are quite effective at keeping ships in sector. Virtually...

Here is your post synopsis: 1. Small ships will be able to defeat large ships. -They already can, and do. 2. Armor would be useful -Why exactly? Weapons would still be far easier to scale up without the disadvantages. 3. Cloaking would be useful -a) It already is, b) Why? 4. Repair...

Is it the same planet that people can make statements that are completely incorrect and present them as fact with no evidence whatsoever?

You haven't "angered" anyone, it's just that your post screams "I haven't played on a server and seen what people do and what works or researched and tested systems" and yet you're trying to propose major balance changes.

Sorry, but this wouldn't solve anything really. 1. Smaller ships being useful? Well they already are, but if they weren't this wouldn't fix that. 2. Armour? Again, no. The problem with armour isn't shields it's weapons. Weapons are stupidly simple to scale up, while trying to scale up armour...

Edit: Example of an offtopic or non constructive post. Would normally be removed on other threads.

"I can derail the thread but no one else is allowed" It doesn't matter what you fight, the point still stands. Starmade's AI is quite frankly shit. It cannot use jamming or passive effects. It cannot perform manoeuvres and it does not use weapons tactically. Only a player does that, so people...

Yes. Only player designed and flown ships are a true representation of combat. Starmade has virtually no PvE at all, you can roflstomp any pirate station with a well designed fighter.

When we're talking about balancing weapons systems, the people who test and use them the most have far more weight in their statements than others.