Search results

True missiles are indeed better also haven't test near friendly ships yet.

Hey everyone! Ships can now be undocking using a logic activation switch... Now you can undock as many fighters as you want at one time! Thanks so much AndyP and schema for listening to me! I know I'm only one of many voices and taking the time to consider this will greatly effect gameplay...

whiterhino16 Ships will be able to be undocked by logic activators, hopefully in the next update... about 30% complete...maybe more things will be added to logic in the future. This thread started with the basic idea of a ship... capable of launching fighters and repairing ships with the push...

NuclearFun yes i'm also enjoying that... just hoping thrusters will be added to logic or at least the push effect... by itself it launches ships like warp but needs a massive amount from what I can tell.. each pulse only pushes my ship 1 m/s very slow for a so called warp. Even if it is that...

Ithirahad No not the command the lack of with plex doors

Logic, Logic it's only logical More is better its almost phenomenal, logic locks on logic doors, logic lifter's for those floors, logic grouping "for my cores";)... and logic pulse for thrust of course! Yes logics here but I only fear my logiastrotecharepairotron can't placed anywhere! I tried...

ohh yea well, in that case my friend you have found a bug.

Borr your first issue is bug #153 the and the plex issue should have been resolved but I will test this out... since I have never used shif+v what is supposed to happen? group selection? lol I don't think we have "group" grouping...

All of the issues you just list are know bugs and being worked on... The d1000+damage beam isn't fully completed yet as well possibly a few other combos I've had no problem linking logic to plex as I have a fex massive ships multiple hanger doors... though I have never used a [shift]+V...

need help starting a stream... what is the best program to use and how to setup my stream? I have Xsplit but wants me to buy in and cant adjust many settings also I don't know where to enter in the stream code... thanks for the help anyone.

Docking could be an issue as you may have multiple ships in queue to land but lag is created when a ship too big to land is assigned to a dock... then what? I could see a fix with there being a message saying the ship cant dock here maybe? also what if you decide to change the shape of your ship...

I'd like to see recorded flight patterns used for thing like escorting, ship protection and wing flight pattern configuration. The ability to record and play back actions to an AI's flight computer by clicking pre-recorded actions like circling a ship patrolling an area.

Doomerzzz True I like that idea! a whole lot less blocks but in the end... with that feature there is no other expandability for it... unlike using a set of blocks you can make into different configurations like a repair conveyor, ship storage, station tram/shuttle service and other user created...

So sorry as I did not think the topic of conversation was of the nature needing to be handled in a private way as the conversation was made to be open and people added... (the options) But I assure you I know what confidentiality is and how to keep secrets just didn't think you would mind... I...

YAY! but aww now I must think of a new mod.... Thank me... I'm welcome me...:p No thanks AndyP

Ithirahad It isn't as easy as I make it sound but It is fairly easy bro.

A no its not just talking with AndyP and said he ask schema B wrong again logic activate the block the block run all possible funtions when triggered true/false... C If you read my entire thread you see I said grieving limited by beams distance and faction... gosh why did I waste my time just...

No again :p The docking beam is exactly like the beam on ships cores already... the only thing being changed is the target effected from its self to another entity... and THAT is not hard at all creating another system would be un-needed is. Its not tractoring its using the same glitch jump...

I'm not worried about publicity of dev versions... just of bugs known and fixed in a simple list with no need for log in information.... what you did was nothing more that further prove my point... you gave me the info but I should have know this by now... why isn't that information in the...

lol I have two browsers open and didn't know I click wrong tread post box... checking on my dog either way still logical sense meant to link page :confused: