Search results

    1. Exozen

      Just gonna leave this here...

      "The intent is to provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment for building different systems. As for distance, we selected initial values based upon data from Criss and other adjustments made to milestone power stability before release. Among other things, we're looking at average...
    2. Exozen

      A knee jerk-reaction on knee jerk-reactions

      They banned you from chat? What.
    3. Exozen

      Starmade memes

    4. Exozen

      StarMade Dev Blog 17 November 2017

      The only miscommunication has been the complete lack of it. Please be more open with us, more truthful; a lot of people give shit, but that's because we truly want your game to flourish, and a lot of these guys know the game really well.
    5. Exozen

      StarMade Dev Blog 17 November 2017

      Wish I had a better solution, and I'm not even sure if this would work, but how about adding a limit to ship's mass/size ratio? Spaghettis have a really low density, probably a hundred or thousand times less than the average ship. Like... a physical build limit that expands as you add more...
    6. Exozen

      I am fury, I am impotent rage.

      I am fury, I am impotent rage.
    7. Exozen

      Starmade memes

      EDIT: BUGS OF DEATHLY POWER CONSUMPTION HAVE BEEN FIXED
    8. Exozen

      Starmade memes

      I HAVE SEEN THE - F U T U R E -
    9. Exozen

      Starmade memes

    10. Exozen

      Devblog 2017 - 10 - 13

      You simply cannot fit a bigger reactor within the ship, this drones is 32 meters long (34 including nose armor piece), the reactor is 9m long, and the stabilizer is 14m long. The required stabilizer distance is 10m.
    11. Exozen

      Devblog 2017 - 10 - 13

      I've been doing testing on small reactors for a few days now, anyways, here's a picture of some small reactors any fighter or drone (sub 50m) using a reactor up to 3x3x3 will be completely and utterly useless
    12. Exozen

      Devblog 2017 - 10 - 13

      at smaller sizes reactors and stabilizers don't need to be equal, i think it's like this until around 100 reactor blocks EDIT: I meant 48 total blocks (26 reactor/22 stabilizer, i mistakenly put 35 (25/10) for some reason
    13. Exozen

      Devblog 2017 - 10 - 13

      As of 200.123, Reactors are still requiring stabilizers waaay too early and tiny reactors (3x3x3 and below) still don't output nearly enough power to be even remotely useful. Drones, fighters, and "small ships" have been nerfed badly, with no hope for recovery in sight, going by the lack of any...
    14. Exozen

      New Power DEV Thread

      You'll never power anything more than a thruster stick with 5 reactors not even 7 or 15, 27, well maybe 27? but that's the bare minimum
    15. Exozen

      New Power DEV Thread

      Guide to reactors: anything between 1 and 5x5 is completely worthless, 5x5 might also be shit, but I don't have any ships of that size. (pictured, as of Dev v0.200.119) 7, 15, 27, and 93, reactors 2, 8, 22, and 88 stabilizers 2, 7, 10, and 18 required space
    16. Exozen

      New Power DEV Thread

      I'll try playing with edited values, what I really need is the reactors starting off with huge power:size ratios then quickly dropping off into a more standard growth rate
    17. Exozen

      New Power DEV Thread

      I was fully expecting reactor sizes/volume to be vastly smaller with the new system, so much so that my sub 50 meter fighters/drones would only need maybe 1-2 reactor blocks, with an excess of power. Instead I find that my ships struggle and can't hardly support themselves at all. My 31m long...
    18. Exozen

      aaaaaaaaa

      aaaaaaaaa
    19. Exozen

      Alone

      Alone
    20. Exozen

      F :(

      F :(