Read by Council Galaxy core

    serge1944

    Grand Admiral of The Infection Initiative
    Joined
    Mar 8, 2014
    Messages
    182
    Reaction score
    34
    • Community Content - Bronze 1
    • Purchased!
    • Legacy Citizen 7
    Galaxy core,we kinda forgot that.
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: jgames666
    Joined
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages
    2,932
    Reaction score
    460
    • Hardware Store
    What about galaxy cores?
    Edit: It is nearly impossible to understand a suggestion, that does not clearly define what it suggests. I can tell it has something to do with galaxy cores, but nothing else.
     
    Last edited:

    Keptick

    Building masochist
    Joined
    Sep 26, 2013
    Messages
    4,062
    Reaction score
    1,841
    • Councillor 2 Gold
    • Railman Gold
    • Thinking Positive Gold
    So uh.... what's the suggestion?
     
    Joined
    Jun 12, 2015
    Messages
    228
    Reaction score
    72
    I think what he wants is more large binary stars near the center of the galaxy, And perhaps a central "Core" object with a ridiculous amount of health but if destroyed all the stars go wizzing off into intergalactic space.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Andem

    serge1944

    Grand Admiral of The Infection Initiative
    Joined
    Mar 8, 2014
    Messages
    182
    Reaction score
    34
    • Community Content - Bronze 1
    • Purchased!
    • Legacy Citizen 7
    What I find strange its that we have galaxys but the number of stars are the same in the core and no black holes.
    Realy why isn't it bright until your eyes burns.
     

    jayman38

    Precentor-Primus, pro-tempore
    Joined
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages
    2,518
    Reaction score
    787
    • Purchased!
    • Thinking Positive
    • Legacy Citizen 4
    I think we have a number of problems at a number of scales:
    1. Planet density: planet spheres are everywhere, interfering with the proper view of space beyond. Nebula backgrounds also provide interference. (I keep my backgrounds off to enjoy simple starry backgrounds.)
    2. I don't think the game properly models star density from galactic center. In real-life galaxies, the core of the galaxy is the bulge, where lots and lots of the galaxy's stars reside, providing extra illumination. As distance from the core increases, star density per cubic parsec should drop off. Plus the center of a galaxy tends to be thicker than the rest of the galaxy, providing even more stars to illuminate the center.
    3. StarMade does not yet model nebulas, and there is a lot of nebula gas at the core of most galaxies, which can reflect and refract light, spreading the light source, so that the center looks like one big light. Hopefully, when nebulas are introduced, some real-life effects like this will be modeled also.
    4. Distance culling to keep the game running smoothly. A lot of stuff is simply removed from view until you get close enough, to keep the game running smoothly.

    Now for some things that alter the way real galaxies are viewed:
    Publicly available images of galaxies typically have non-visible wavelengths converted to visible light for effect. This dramatically effects how bright celestial bodies look. They are actually dimmer than you would expect. However, since this is game about SciFi space, not real space, this can be ignored, and those nebulas and galaxies can be as bright as we imagine.
    The nebula gas I described above typically interferes with light, so that it not only spreads the light out, but also dims it. Publicly available images are brightened for dramatic effect. Again, this can be ignored in the game for the sake of SciFi space.
    Extremely long exposure times can make other galaxies look extraordinarily bright in photos, especially towards the center, even though, in fact, it isn't any brighter than our own galaxy.