Search results

So apart from roleplay and fun, is there really any legitimate reason to use missiles instead of cannons or beams? It seems that they are less powerful with less chance to hit (courtesy of missing or AMS)

I cant really claim credit for the idea, as it has kicked around the drone R&D and a load of other threads for a while., but I do think that it would remove the need for ammunition based missiles. Someone suggested something like weapon grouping with the warheads that would work thusly: as you...

I expect that in most cases single groups would be the way to go, but in this very specific purpose, the whole point is to overwhelm AMS, so the answer is: FIRE ALL THE MISSILES! In most other situations, single groups is probably better. Thoughts anyone?

It would be interesting to see how many missile tubes on could run from a single or double power reactor. Just thinking that the most expensive part of this setup is the computers and as of the latest update the increase for multiple groups is significantly lower. Hence, more missile tubes per...

This sounds like a cool Idea But I think the reverse might be even better, Counter AMS Drones! 1 core, 1 thruster, 1 power, 1 missile, 1 cannon Repeat as necessary I can just imagine launching 30 of them and recreating the arrow scene from 300 with pointless missiles. The best part is that...

I would argue that the current missile system should suffice, but there is a particular niche not being filled in the spectrum of weaponry available. As has been mentioned, there is no powerful but very limited use weapon in the game that would fulfill the new consumissle hole. To this I would...