Search results

probably depends on who youre fighting. there were no pros back then and im pretty sure there arent really any now lol words have meaning. and everyones definitions for rules and fair are different. personally i find clipping multiple blocks into the same space cheaty, and yet i dont...

dear everyone here arguing: your mistake was thinking the perfect most optimal most efficient reactor setup is the thing to obsess over. almost no good pvp ship ever had "perfect" power.

holy shit

*actual TLDR: leave the game a broken mess to spite some pvpers. good one, its not like 99% of the games other players also left because its broken and unfun or anything... oh.

this is called theory crafting, and youve missed a lot of variables that dont work as youve assumed. most of what you have here is wrong, no matter how right it sounds like it should be.

this is wrong for the same reason not adapting is wrong. we already learned, and we already made new stuff, and neither of those things were the least bit challenging. for him to be a dissenter, his opinion would need to be minority lol you may be confusing "only option" with "only...

but thats not even relevant. you specifically said it should default to off... earlier you claimed you suggested it would default to on. you specifically suggested that pvp servers be forced to follow your rules, simply because no other server alteratives were aailable. you did not mention any...

im not taking anything out of context. you deliberately suggested that all servers have consensual only pvp, as well as a toggle flag that defaults to off. you also said basically all opposing views were just shouting you down for opposing all pvp etc, and clearly thats not the case. you...

ok. you deliberately lied. you campaigned to make all pvp servers have to follow your personal opinions for consensual pvp only. you suggested that pvp be turned OFF by default, not on. oh heres where i (and many others) explicitly agreed that controls were a good option...

"They devs already said they are intentionally not trying to advertise, " this was the only accurate statement in your post. idk if youre just really invested in your lie, or youre batshit crazy. i guess it doesnt matter either way huh.

you can stop your delusional agenda. we havent been saying there shouldnt be options for server owners, we disagree with the idea of forcing those rulesets. you see where you equated people not agreeing with your preferred pvp style as people who think you want all people banned? you see where...

its a terrible idea but you should do it anyway.

youre talking about me. macthule accused me directly of being a rival game developer last december along with a bunch of other crazy shit. he wanted to post up some self serving bullshit here now that "were all banned" ... ... lol

Az14el ...but its really glowy now

i see macthules still delusional

the answer is no. vanilla is too broken to sustain a population, and the "near vanilla" changes required to keep things running properly are both a 24/7 commitment and basically impossible to implement.

bb. op since inception.

i read what he says. i dont care how "ugly" a word is, i care what thought it conveys. i mean, your avg tanks turret is 30% its total. but i think the point here if going for some sorta pseudo realism (stupid idea anyway) is that in a future where warp technology is as common as dirt, thered...

pvpers need core game mechanics to satisfy their gameplay requirements. rpers need added features to satisfy their gameplay requirements. stop making this out to be some kinda 12 yr old its not fair us vs them content argument. besides... pvp died with 2.0, so idk what leg youre leaning on...