The menu icons got changed in the dev.
Bugs / Issues which need a look:
[*]The new ice planet surface is ugly, does not look realistic and is bugged if flipped upside down.
[*]You can turn Lava on and off on default.
[*]Light emmitting things are darker if enclosed by plex glass or water - these should not have any effect. Technically it is not a bug, but a missing case-handling.
There might be other things, but I only remeber these so far.
Good things:
I suggest to merge/use the Walzou Texture Pack with realistic (or parts of it) if it is possible (licenses, agreement, etc). It looks pretty, has good details, and is a bit smaller than "Realistic".
It also has some parts which are really realistic. I guess "realistic" should originally be named "clean", in which case it would score better messured on what it should be.
Bugs / Issues which need a look:
- "Realistic" blocks with 256 take about 1/3 of StarMade's archive size (The other 1/3 by "Comic" blocks and 2 huge data/models - it would be good to have at least these two things separated).
- There is no way to go back to the old ones short of editing the png files or have no build icons for the Tetra/Penta.
- Power blocks are too bright/animated.
I think thrusters are an improvement compared to the old ones - even weapon cpu, gravity block and similar, but all that can't help out if there are such important and annoying blocks dominating the texture pack.
[*]The new ice planet surface is ugly, does not look realistic and is bugged if flipped upside down.
[*]You can turn Lava on and off on default.
Off suggests that lava does no damage, but that is not true.
[*]Light emmitting things are darker if enclosed by plex glass or water - these should not have any effect. Technically it is not a bug, but a missing case-handling.
There might be other things, but I only remeber these so far.
Good things:
- Cristals, lava and transparent ice look good. Same as the front of weapon cpu, thrusters, etc.
I suggest to merge/use the Walzou Texture Pack with realistic (or parts of it) if it is possible (licenses, agreement, etc). It looks pretty, has good details, and is a bit smaller than "Realistic".
It also has some parts which are really realistic. I guess "realistic" should originally be named "clean", in which case it would score better messured on what it should be.