Search results

The beams are back since the v0.201.364 it seems to me. however, can we hope for example documentation on the use of the rule system?

Hello, In this new version, it is announced that the beam between the stabilizers and the reactor has been removed and if I understood correctly, it would be possible to put it back with the system of rules: « Remove reactor stabilization beam (can be re-added by rules » That said...

Hello everyone, Like many of us, one of my biggest concerns in StarMade is making the transition from the old power system to the new reactor system. Either trying to update my old constructions, which is not always possible, either by creating new constructions. This week, I spent many hours...

In the publication of December 22, you announce the possibility of diverting the flow of energy using knot blocks, I tried many attempts to achieve it but without result, the flow continues to take the most court path without take into account the presence of the nodes. Please, would you be kind...

This discussion is totally sterile and not constructive, you try to sell me the pure theory by taking into account only part of the problem. I will not detail everything to try to justify myself, I feel I do not have to do it, I have other concerns in life. My designs will go to the trash...

I work on a small ship (about 20 x 20 x10) but the layout of a power system in this configuration is not serious, I can not get enough power to power the thrusters, for the rest it is not even possible. Unless deporting the stabilizers outside the ship which is not part of my way of seeing...

Why have increased the distance between the reactor and the stabilizers in these latest versions? It was not hard enough? I really do not understand anymore ...

Thank you for this information, I will test when I have more time, I am very busy with my work now, but I think it can be very useful.

I find your approach very interesting, it is much more explicit than the one proposed by default, pretty, clean and functional, I adhere to this interface proposal.

It's been several days since I've been trying to understand how this new energy system works and get to something functional, but the results are far from conclusive. I know that this version is still in the development phase, but I revise my enthusiasm downward as the complexity is such that I...

I think we can not blame them for taking more time than expected, during a development phase, there are always unexpected problems. I prefer to wait a little longer rather than pay the price of a sloppy job. (especially with regard to the critics who are not encouraging). But a little more...

From what I have just read, I think that the exasperation of this interminable waiting begins to be felt. Dear developers, please tell us about your progress. :)

Thank you for this additional information, however a little suggestion comes to mind: Could we attribute the role of chamber ducts to existing non-cubic pipes? This would allow you to avoid implementing an additional block in the game but also to join the useful to the enjoyable.

it's sad to read so much negative speculation on a system that is not yet finalized, all because people are afraid to change their little habits of slippers. The fear of change and unhappy human but it does not make the man more open and more intelligent ...

After a long search on the web to find this kind of script, the only solution proposed always brings back to this site "starmade-servers.com". And if I do not want to register on this site who want to keep the monopoly how I do? Well, there is an alternative, thanks to starnet, it is possible, I...

... apparently, yes I am the only one who asks me all these questions.

(The subject PVP vs RP is useless is irrelevant since PVP players play on PVP servers and RP players on RP servers, and if not, it's their fault, so the problem is resolved :-p) This video gives me enthusiasm and I hope that the update will soon be available. I thank the development team for...

I am of your opinion but to have more support, please follow this guide: Phabricator Guide

This is the kind of problem I encounter in my factory, I tried to expose it to the phabricator although my way is not at all consistent, I hope it will be taken into account.

Thanks for this information, I have not seen these lines in my blockbehaviourconfig.xml Sorry for this unnecessary post, at the same time it is not invented ...