Search results

Are you talking about a procedurally generated feature, or something that happens over time because of player action? Because let me tell you, after a space battle, you better believe the winning side salvages the losers down to the core if their ship is made of anything halfway useful. EDIT...

Ideally, every new update the best ships on the site since the last update would be chosen by popularity, and then somebody, be they a dev or a councilor or just a volunteer would take a nice screenshot and that would be the new background until the next update. So anywhere between 2 and 5 weeks.

From what it sounds like you are trying to do, using an activator next to a rail would be a far better solution. Rails emit a high signal when they are occupied.

Maybe, no.

That would be neat, but it doesn't carry the same benefits that showing off the best of what the community is cooking up any given week. It could change every update.

The new menu looks amazing, and the screenshot in the back looks great, even if it is just a temporary placeholder. But rather than just making the camera move, or maybe cycling through a few different moving shots, why not involve the community? The long and short of it all is this: use fancy...

Is the initial load-in time way longer for everybody or is it just me?

Hooray! Are we a real game yet?

Of course, I am very confident in your guys' ability to come up with a practical solution. But for now, I object very strongly to the outright removal of docked generators.

These look amazing, if you were any other builder I'd point out how unbelievable it is that you did this all in about a week. The ships do look a bit similar in form and function, maybe add in a freighter for good measure and pick one of the existing five to leave out.

Well, hopefully this, along with an easier way to change .cfg options, will be in the next update, which I've heard probably includes a main menu.

Congrats on your first Starmade video. Content wise, your video is a bit lacking. Maybe use build mode next time to speed up the process and you'll be able to show more off during your video. You can do that on a planet by placing and then entering a build block. I also recommend switching...

This sounds more like a mod than a real game suggestion. And not a particularly good one. 1. As a whole, I object to this because while docked generators and shield suppliers may need balancing, removing them entirely is a terrible solution. You don't mend a compound fracture by amputating...

I just hope that the other two people who followed this thread so diligently will get the message. Then again, if by some miracle they do submit entries you'll have an easy time picking the first and second place winners.

That's exactly what I'm saying, good stuff. But yeah, if you must have a cargo module that will dock to anything, slap a USD on it. Problem instantly solved.

I don't see a need for this. Too many variables. Are the modules contained? Do they have doors? Why does it need to dock to a USD? This is one of those things that seems like it might be useful, but in reality is just way too impracticable and unnecessary. It works with USDs because all USDs...

Does that include the cargo pod logic-pocalypse?

You could choose class names that relate to the ship's weaponry. Like a missile frigate, escort frigate, aegis destroyer.

Yeah, the entire OP just seems like stuff we can assume will be in the game. I'm way more interested in having quests and missions that are actually interesting. If the quest system never evolves beyond things that have been a mainstay of RPGs since before they were played on computers I will...

This sounds a lot more like an engineered problem than a real thing. If somebody really wants to counter boarders in the most ridiculous way I can imagine, instead of just using a 7 block anti-infantry turret, let them.