Search results

I don't think I've ever played on one that didn't charge for players.... how else would people run out of FP?

*sets "Death" to provide FP*

Yes, that should work fine.

Try making a copy of your blueprints folder and then clear out your main one. Sometimes when you have too many BPs saved the game starts to freak out when you add a new one.

It's an exploit in that it's exploiting a function of power transferring up the docking chain that wasn't intended to be in the game. Really, though, the game is breaking because you're pushing the engine too hard. You've got a ship with, what, at LEAST 465 entities on a single ship there?

Yay, but losing HB protection shouldn't be the default option, as it's very punishing to new players.

Why no Centipede pics in the fleet photos?

Welcome back.

It's Schema telling you to stop making your expoitmobile. ;)

And you know this based on your extensive history of working on Starmade's code, I assume? Nevermind that thrust profiles don't even properly save with the blueprint. I don't object to overpowered exploits being removed, no. Also, ships with docked thrusters patched still worked. It's not like...

Question- Don't the explosion patterns change for every reactor shape and layout, meaning that trying to armor "where the explosions will happen" on a reactor just results in the explosions shifting location? Of course, you can get around that by docking armor, I suppose, but people have...

To quote myself... Also, it would be really annoying to not be able to remove the territory of a solo player who got bored with a server and left. I don't see why we couldn't have both of these. It'd help with making the claim stations that provide FP for the protected bases able to actually...

Well, for starters, you could make it so you can only make a base invulnerable in territory you control. This would prevent you from making a LRM station that bombards someone else's station, unless that station is right on the edge of a system. If there's something like a 15 minute (server...

Alpha is not a reason to break every single existing ship for zero reason. What does block-based directional thrust actually add to the game, besides making building a ship a bigger pain in the ass, and, as stated previously, requiring you to make a shitty ball of thrusters instead of a 3 block...

While this suggestion could alter short term tactics, in the long term, having multiple invincible bases is an additional drain on faction points that accelerate a side's demise as their generating territories are picked off by enemy fleets.

And destroy every existing ship, while making the game more complex and getting around outside bases via thrustersticks more difficult at the same time?

The simple solution to this is to have a timer before the station becomes protected, and to prevent damaged stations from being protected (requiring a reboot first). I think that invulnerability only while members are offline is a bad mechanic, as it encourages people to just log out when...

This suggestion is assuming that an inverted FP config becomes the default in the future. This is running somewhat counter to what many people have suggested. I think people should be able to protect multiple stations with HB protection, at the cost of faction points. This is to encourage...

I have never wanted turrets and docked on in combat, ever. That would make missiles impossible to use.

I feel like this might be a bit of an issue for me, seeing as how I use thrusters as a filler block once all my weapons, power, shields, armor, and passives are in...