Search results

This sounds like too much effort (and strain on processors) without enough benefit

I like all of these ideas.

When I load a ship from local (on NASS) the ship doesn't appear in my personal files section of the catalog.

many of these are good ideas. I have always been a proponent of multi-block interactions, of having actual DESIGN having an effect on your ship\'s performance. I happen to think that every major system should have to touch a power cable, and loose effectiveness if disconnected from the main...

I love all of these things. The RTS could get a little wierd, I would say that is a \"DISTANT future\" thing.

these seem like good ideas, except that the beam weapons shouldn\'t lock on. You might consider the possibilities of having weapon blocks and weapon MODIFIER blocks. I favor having three types of directional weapons (beam, pulse, and projectile) with low damage maximums suitable for fighters...

I normally get by with... fewer turrets. And I normally only have to set them up once, or maybe twice. A large ship is going to entail a lot of work. A VERY large ship is going to require somewhat more effort.

totally on board as well

I like this idea

+1

Rather than having the entire ship be \"packaged\" into something portable, why not have a disk with the plans of the ship that can be used on an automatic construction machine near some stores (or able to be made one\'s self using a process scimilar to docking modules but requiring power? This...

hehe heheheheh LOLOLOLOL 1x1 space HAHA

+1 this annoys me as well

none of this is even remotely possible. you would not like seeing it attempted

I would suggest two tiers of weapons. The first would be wholly self-contained, fighter weapons if you will. These would have a rather sharp downward curve of # of blocks per effect, making them inefficiant for capital ships to use. The second teir of weapons would be capital weapons, which...

I like this idea

I like these ideas