Search results

Well-written idea, I defenitely agree. The concept in itself might be somewhat bulky code-wise, but I say this is probably the most engine-friendly way to do it. For furher simplifictionm, though, there should be no replacement core, but attempting to place a regular core on a ship should place...

Well, both the percentage, the conig, and a system simplifying editing pirate ships should be introduces, I belive.

I agree the plethora of suggestions here could use some more organization, but there is already a thread for this, and the new google moderator page. Then of course, I wouldn\'t say either really lives up to it\'s purpose, we need something more dynamic, possibly some form of adapted graphical...

Well, I suppose the restriction is there for a reason, seemingly forcing players to build bases, but I agree that they should be allowed to opt for a huge mothership and nomadic style. Perhaps some space-consuming restrictions, like factory blocks on ships having to be placed on a special...

Wonderful idea, defenitely needed. Here\'s my take on the details. There are three block types needed to get a properly working landing system. Landing gear projectors, at least one cockpit and a landing cmouter. The former two must be linked to the computer, like any other blocks are. They...

Well, it\'s not that simple. There are more things on a ship that generate heat than running thrusters, though they could stand for most of it. But basic faction-sensory equippmnt should be installed, I agree to that.

So, the only more general millitary institution is patrol?

This is jut one of the variations, it\'s been suggested before. Besides, structures designed for bigger ships are intended to be annoing to build.

Well, patrol sounds good, though industry and supply are also interesting. And the latter two are so closely related I\'d almost ask to join \'em both. Is the ministry of command only for commanders, or are the ministries lower rank corresponding with the lower general ranks? Though choise.

How about a scanner beam, which can tell you the mineral composition, player presence and other things about a planet? And why not other ships as well?

I\'ll ask agin, will the ranks be filled from below or above?

I don\'t speak for administration, but consider yourselves until told otherwise. Edit: how come every time I say this, obishawn beats me to it? Another edit: then my ship should do rather good, provided we fill the ranks from above and downwards, and not the other way around.

Well, the prices should most certainly be modified, but I disapprove of the cooldown. Instead, it should be more of a warm-up, you have to wait for each ship to be fully constructed, longer the larger it is.

Well, the entire point of factories and undeathinators being limited to stayions is to force you to build them. If you don\'t like it.... I almost said \"too bad\" there, but that would be counterproductive. I think this is why we need some form of bulky space station relocation tech, may it be...

Coould you add sub-suggestions to them, for example the warp drive and the jumgetes to the warp suggestion. Also, the subgestions should in turn have links to the more prominent places where they are suggested. Also add nanotech. And a variation to the spawn limit- ship spawning taking time...

Agreed, this shuld be implemented.

Well, I suppose you could say a tractor beam an be adjusted both before and after activation, but they\'re still essentaily the same thing. As for why I prefer jump drives for stations, it\'s exactly for the same resson, they\'re not made to move. As I said in the other tractor beam thread, a...

Considering that the first one to sign up in every ministry gets the supreme rank, shouldn\'t it rationally be so that those who come second and third should get the second and third highest rank?

Of you\'re just wondering, just read the comments.

What is your standing on non-SW ship designs? It seems the majority of the ships will be from other canons. I don\'t mind, rebels shouldn\'t care about cosmetics.