Search results

want. update.

I like the overall idea, that more sectors owned give me more protection. Nice thoughts. I would do it differently: My homebase is allways invulnerable. But I can have other bases around my homebase, that are protected, if I have enough sectors claimed with another station. If the stations get...

I have read all of the bigger complaints about the moderation. The striking goal for me was, when this forum thread : You've Messed Up. got opened, and got as of today 29 supporting ratings, versus 2 (wow) disagree ratings. (I disagreed with it.) First of: Why do I take it so serious? "Why...

I think fabulous in an ironic meaning would do just a decent job for this matter. :D

I didn't read the op in detail (too complicated) =) Question: This thread is about pure pvp servers, or for servers where we want to mix up base building (creative part) and pvp teritorial gameplay? I mean it's important to clarify this...If you want to have base and outpost building as part...

Personally I would make the gain of faction points accordingly to actions on the server, be it pvp or trading with other players (not npcs) or by doing quests, or by simply being online. Then I would make safe sectors where players can build their own stations. Maybe in some cases even in a...

That's a hidden feature. It works not by filling the storage. You have to place down one cargo block, and then copy one cargo block. Rotating that copied 1x1x1 selection let's you browse through all the block versions.

Whaaat? Ofcourse the opening post has to give one example solution. It's one solution I came up with after 2 minutes of thinking. It's not golden and I know that you guys have better ideas. If you read the post again, I also added in another one from another poster that was in the first 3...

Yes I am theorizing, whatever this means. Because I don't know it. You know that I am not a pvper. Not because I am not up for a competition, but because I only pvp when I like the meta. Dota 2, for example, has a great meta, I play it often. The general and majority of SM pvp...sux right now...

I really like this one. Do you mind uploading it to the CC please? =) Anyway I really want to have such a ship, I might build one on my own. Nice work overall. I am not a Star Wars interpretations fan, but I really like that you focus on smaller ships and fighters too.

Yo man, let me critique you. =) I have looked at your recent workshop entries and think here is a good place to leave it. GI-RE Chabaz Apartments GI-RE Interior Bar Booth are nice ideas and look pretty good. Now I mention booth, comes to mind the critique on the bigger picture when you try to...

Please stop the turret talks and spagetti stuff. ^^ Seriously... > Docked hull. Thats my only issue why I have written here. I know you guys see other problems with the pvp but maybe they don't belong into this thread...its just confusing to read that stuff. Anyway, to talk again about docked...

I for my part, was currious on the docked armor thoughts of the people. I think docked armor is bad, any ship part besides moving stuff or turrets, should not raise the overall efficiency of the ship. It leads to unneccessarily complicated build metas, where I have to add an extra docked armor...

But then small ships in small hangars and all the cool stuff that only has 1 block wide gaps doesn't work anymore. You then would not be able to fly a small scooter through a floor of a space station.

So docked armor is not an important balance issue?

Thanks for the heads up Schema. I think this power update will turn out very nice. Even if there will be some flaws, they will be figured out sooner or later. It's good that the pvp mechanics get deeply adressed, even though it seems to be stressfull...At least the majority of people knows, that...

So I am just currious if you guys (pvpers) have any ideas on how to approach this problem. It seemed to be an critique worthy point on the new system, and I am very interested on how other players think about this problem and possible solutions. So here is my first idea on how to solve it: If...

mass turret controls - whatever this means, but schema seems to implement it.