Search results

Adding that GIF didn't really help making your cog rage less funny. It's not my intention to mock you, I just have to laugh.

With 600 unresolved bugs that's not an issue. :p

All those optimizations make the coders of other, less smoothly running games look bad. Maybe each dev team should employ at least one cat.

Why don't you just connect one storage to the shop and then multiple further storages to the first one?

Note that damage beams are bugged, they do too little damage to armor after armor HPs are gone. Also, there's no use in adding more than 10% explosive effect for cannons and beams. Edit: Fixed error, ty Lecic.

The position of thrusters in a ship isn't relevant, which is an intentional design decision, why should it be different for docked entities?

That's exactly what we don't want, since it heavily punishes decorative parts at the outside and empty spaces (e.g. crew quarters) inside a ship.

Water ships only rotate around a vertical axis. Spaceships, however, can rotate around arbitrary axes. Thus it's a bit more difficult, the inertia tensor has to be used. I made a comprehensive suggestion about it a while ago, where I also argue that its calculation doesn't have to be done in...

A lot of cool stuff could be built but isn't, simply because builders want their ships to be actually useful, not only good looking. No matter how big something is, if it's docked there's always that single point of failure. One lucky shot and the whole thing is gone or worse, lagging the server...

In that case I'd call it a resurrection.

It's a popular suggestion that's still valid and hasn't received a tag, yet, so it doesn't really count as necro-post.

I'm planning to buy a new videocard and wanted to ask for some advice. I'd like to play StarMade with a decent framerate, even when large ships and planets are involved. I have an Intel Core i7-3930K CPU @ 3.20GHz and 12 GB RAM. Any recommendations?

I made a suggestion to massively improve copy-pasting quite a while ago. I wish people would bump it from time to time. :rolleyes:

Or give targets a weight according to their distance. A target 10 times further away than another one would have a 10 times lower chance of being selected as a target.

Did you read the thread? Not a single post claims that swarmers would not be OP in that case. What certain people (including myself) want, is a different kind of nerf than friendly fire, not an OP weapon.

I suggested something like this right when blueprints were implemented.

But you can have 100 faction blocks in 100 20-block-drones.

In case of faction blocks, whose 99% are rounded to 1, the inaccuracy (leaked damage 0->1) is even infinite.

I was thinking the same. I really don't want to be forced to make such complicated and lag-inducing stuff to stay competitive. However, there's an important point everyone seems to have missed so far (unless it escaped me). While a 500k shield pool does regenerate slower after a 300k hit than a...

But you have to replace each shape seperately. It would be cool if we could just replace a block type with another regardless of shape. PS: your Mars is on the wrong orbit.