Search results

That's the thing---I want to be able to lock this down without resorting to extreme measures. I want to be able to give my friend permission to edit my designs, but not the whole faction (Who I might want to share these ships with, without letting them take the BPs to other servers/SP).

The problem is, I like to operate solo/with just one other person, even in a larger faction. So I want my friend capable of editing my ships and saving them, but not everybody else of his rank and above in the faction.

----Generic Status Here----

Good. More firepower is never optional. ------I hope you didn't think I was gonna give that one up. Because I'm not.

I'm calling out everybody who even thinks about extending this. Honestly, I did not read your entire wall of text, I skimmed. I missed the part about "should stop" and went straight past into irrelevant-content-land before figuring I'd try to stop that discussion before it wasted a lot of time...

This is apparently only missing some rapid-deployment racks on the ceiling for power armor suits to start wrecking any potential boarders looking to steal your storages' loot (Not that that's too common, but still, extra killing machines are extra killing machines.

I would like to see wedges with inclinations of 1 and 1/4, and then wedges with 1/4 width (Same height [one full block], but only as thick as a 1/4 slab). And any other intermediate slab width. I just really want the 1/4 inclination. Although a 1/2 inclination would also be highly useful, I...

Hold on. Give me one sentence (Maybe two. And no run-ons) that explain any advantage that allowing designs that cannot truly be used to be posted on the dock. There is NO POINT. This system absolutely positively never-in-a-million-years should have anything to do with the dock. Because SMD CC is...

Madman cancels Play StarMade: Interrupted by terrible animation.

I really want to see 1/4-height slabs. The problem is that a method to make 2 blocks occupy one space (A 1/4 slab and a 1/4 slope) doesn't exist (Or at least that's what I gather from previous responses to requests for this feature). But 1/4 would likely be the most useful.

JinM, you really do need to take this a bit, well, lighter. I believe that Erth was just laughing at the "And agree that I'm always right", while Whammy does have a point about your pointless threat. EDIT: No pun intended. But I'm not gonna remove it :) -----Back on topic, I agree that ships...

I mentioned that in a recent post, the idea that an overheated ship might be deserving of the loss of its protection. Because really, once you've overheated it, it's yours anyway.

Did he just state that a change to CC, which he claims never to use, affects him? Without providing proof/a thought as to why? I'm so much done. How about we agree to disagree. And then agree that I am always right.

JinM, do us all a favor---do not try to tell us what we think or want. I do not want anything like this in the CC. And, come on now, man, it makes no flipping sense. You can't have unshareable designs on a site made for sharing! It's Community Content, not "I don't wanna share this design so...

My opinion is that this would exist for each entity separately. You cannot blueprint the original ship, and it will tell you so, and not try to make a blueprint of only the unprotected chunks. You can copy the turrets...if you can get in them (Seriously though, they should be protected well if...

You need to stop. Just stop. I don't know why anything concerning the CC is now in the OP or wherever you found it, but that is a completely optional thing. Say that you support the in-game part but not the idea of out-of-game tracking of ownership and copying ability (Just like me: I want this...

I would really rather keep it simple (stupid). Three types of entity metadata/tags: Basic entity---no protection, can be copied/saved/downloaded to local/etc. Complete protection---Cannot be copied, repaired, (Perhaps disallow changes as well?), saved, anything. For-sale protection (Better...

Are you certain? Because it shouldn't really. A sphere's volume to surface area ratio is far better. I don't remember all my volume formulas (I know, what a terrible person), but I think that a triangular...prism? Right? (Wedge-shape in space, basically) has a formula of 1/2b*h*w, compared to a...

Thank you for remembering. Because more firepower is not an option.

The sloped armor effect is a bit exaggerated in this game. There's no shot deflections/ricochets, so sloped armor is only taking advantage of thickness vs. slope, and even that is somewhat meaningless in a voxel game. Imagining a tilted plate is all well and good, but with a voxel structure, you...