Search results

This is just refitting the T-65 with the new power system.

This is mostly for server owners. What I would like to know is how many servers are running custom power configs? If you would like to tell us what you did that would be nice as well, but not nesisarly.

Power 2.0: What the hell is this? Someone pleas tell me this is an early April fools joke. When the first few dev builds came out I liked what I saw, except for the stabilizers. Now I am not sure what to think. Personally there is a problem when you can't properly power an even half way...

Just this.

I am very worried that if the problems with this new update, are not resolved one way or another very soon. Most of the community is going to leave and never come back.

No kidding, I think every one is on the edge of their seats, for one reason or other.

When people actually played together instead of f****** eachother. Those little bugs on derelict stations. Can't think of a third right now.

Not nesisarly it depends on what you are going for. Small craft built for hit and run might find high cap and low gen better, as they only need the shields to last long enough for them to hit the target and then bug out. In the case of a drone or warhead missile, the shields just need to keep...

Creative idea, but I don't think it addresses the primary complaint about stabilizers.

If that happens, designing turrets is going to be a pain in the ass. The last thing I want to see is the weapons effects turned into chambers or something like them. Chambers might work for ship mounted weapons, but turrets would be effected negatively. It is already hard to make reasonably...

An interesting problem, I haven't built a ship like that in years. That's all well and good, but chambers have replaced systems. No more scaners, jump drives, power capacitors, cloaking computers, jamming computers, and so on. Sure things like shields and thrusters that could work, but not for...

Happy New Year every one.

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't that the derection they have started in. They decreased the distance needed and added power beams.

As it stands get rid of Stabilizers are at 61%. Keep them is at 17% and if the keep them and keep working on them combine you have about 24%. Replace is at 14% and I thought that was going to higher, but I guess not. In any case keep is less then 1/4th of the pole so far. Now you can argue that...

Well currently the sample size we have is 39 players. That might be a lot, that might be a drop in the bucket. I am not sure how many stardock accounts there are, or how many are active.

Interesting results so far, though I would like to see a biger sampling.

I would agree with you. It also means you can't hide your reactor. You have 50/50 chans of guessing where the reactor is.

I did not mean all the way in the back, I ment relatively. After all if you are sitting in the back seat of a car you are not saying on the very back of said car, the trunk is usually there. I may have found another flaw, or inconsistency. Taking out the ship cores used to be the way to kill a...

Normally it's a reactor in the back and big ass gun in the front. The stabilizers are a pain when your gun takes up the front of your ship.

Okay! some very good posts and then there was total cancer. Okay have you ever tried to develop something? I have built several servers with costume ships, stations, and AI faction. Believe me when you do that you fined you have very little time to actually play the game. And then of course...