Search results

No no, I meant on the individual content pages. It allows that user who posted it to see you made the video, first of all, and second it brings you beau-coup views when they add it to the description.

The negative ratings were removed because they were being abused. And then we started to use neutral ratings as a replacement for negative ones and the whole positive/neutral/negative thing was removed entirely.

Nice idea, but let's be real: nobody here really has the skinny on whether or not this will work. Luckily, this idea has come up so many times that I'm positive the devs are aware of it. If they deem it doable, maybe we'll see it some day. But I wouldn't hold my breath.

Regarding NPC faction generation. Will there be a fixed faction attached to each fleet of ships that is developed either from the devs or the contests? Or will the system be more procedural, using a system similar to how planets are named?

Also make sure you post them as comments on the community content page; it's great way to get views! I know I feature reviews of my ships pretty prominently.

This thread went from amazing, to sad, and then to just silly.

Let's not break down the farm because we got a new tractor, people. Olxinos's design is great, and the small animation it goes through while docking is negligible. If you want to create your own design that avoids this infinitesimally small problem, you can do that.

Conceptually a UNSC frigate is lightly armored (60cm) compared to the similarly sized UNSC destroyer (150 cm). But honestly, armor wise do what feels best. You wanna focus on shields, do it that way and then back them up with effects to strengthen them. Same thing with armor.

I love this. But what I love even more is that that thing works because an insane amount of Orks just believe it should.

Are you a robot?

That is some DOPE work.

You build ships very strangely. But it looks amazing.

This sounds awful. Like, I get it, and I get the purpose, but I still found myself asking "Why?" Beyond all the reasons Lukwan pointed out, just conceptually, why?

Hey! That's really good: instantly recognizable. It would be very cool to see a 1:1 Paris Class. Nobody ever builds them that big, but the scale on the conning tower portion you finished leads me to believe you could.

I agree, but also I don't. Remember all the cool new detailing we were able to do when hull become noticeably different from other blocks of the same color? A slightly larger variance between standard and advanced would provide a huge increase in detail potential for a very small investment on...

Standard and Advanced are a bit too similar looking. Since hull is drastically different from standard and advanced, my opinion is that standard and advanced should be as different from one another as they are from hull.

No, it doesn't look like that, dude. You heard the dev, it's not happening in the near future; there's no need to press the issue. Complexity isn't the issue, but rather, is this truly worthy of the devs' time and energy for the small (and dubious) benefit it would provide.

On the last page I made a suggestion that the devs experiment with letting a community member create a couple variants of the TG frigate just to see how it turned out. Hell, if it was available for download I'd do it for fun and to prove that it could be a worthwhile possibility.

Still haven't heard a compelling argument for modules of variants. Overall, a series of random interchangeable rooms is far less immersive than a hand-crafted variant, no matter how slight the difference between the variant and the original.

Yes, I understand it would be an advantage to a faction; what I was saying is that that advantage would actually be a detrimental feature, as it gives larger factions able to sustain such a system an even greater advantage than they have already.