Search results

That's called blueprints.

Nope.

I didn't talked about turrets, just about broken, OP and laggy things. Idc about self powered turrets, so I'm not against, as long as they are not another exploit source.

And how would you build a massive shipyard without the advanced build mode ? A la minecraft ? :ROFLMAO:

Docked power was potentially laggy, stupidly a must-have, and OP. Chaindrive is OP (a well designed thing but still OP) . Launching rails clocks were laggy. And all docked entities must impact the final mass of the ship. Not doing so is clearly... Idiot ? (I don't remember if it's already...

AlabasterJazz I agree, but not with tedious things. Like fuel (or it must be something I don't have to care more than an automated refuel, which I pay at each faction turn). That will never make a game. You don't play any 4X game just to have fun refueling each of your ship, don't you ? ;) A...

I'm not against some good survival aspect. I just don't want useless and/or time eating features like hunger, fuel, any form of blocks (un)locking or too much management. Those who want that must think about the players who can't live behind their computer, or have barely 1h / 30 minutes on a...

Already pointed out by the devs that SM won't be survival. As an optional config, fuel is good. As a main feature, that's crap for all of those who want to play in a short session, and don't want to waste their precious time refueling their ships for the sake of "more survival".

That was back on the old stations, when there was still SDKB missiles... I attacked a station with a little corvette (<100 blocks long) that I downloaded. I don't even remember how I won, but the whole face of my ship was just destroyed x)

If it is a concern during testing, we could implement a form of power penalty that increases the % top-off rate depending on reactor vs weapon size ratio. That is called speculations, not facts. Mortiferum

Stop to think about mass, if their combined weapons can beat the shield regen then yes. Because mobility and no more OP turrets. But I agree that 50k is maybe too light, or they must be more than 10.

Fighters are not becoming the new meta... What we want is that a titan can be destroyed by a good squad of smaller ships, not one fighter. A titan might be what he has to be : a powerful weapon but expensive and weak if alone. It's not balanced if your ship can have all you want without...

Where did you found a super-ship which is so reliable that even some medium mobile ships can't take it down TrainDodger ? In any game, any film or anime, any book, super-ships are really powerful (think about Sajuuk), but they are soooo slow and big that they are just a blind turtle needing an...

If self powered turrets can be used for exploits, there's only 2 options : Finding a solution which is not a quick workaround as we oversee here, and which nullify the exploits Deleting self powered turrets Nothing more.

Then go away if SM isn't your game. We'll not retain you don't worry.

Stop complaining. The actual broken system is purely annoying. Creating energy through a tiny little magical cube, and being forced to be USELESS (in energy side) under some minimal dimensions (caused by the actual "optimal" reactors) is nothing but a good system. And yes, there are dudes who...

What I find even more worrying is that you want to add another limiting factor (the decay), worst than fuel in terms of time wasted for players who don't have many time to play or don't want it. And for a virtual problem. Even me, who has never done any real PvP fight, I know that many manned...

But I don't care about the sun being a 2D sprite or a model. I prefer that Schema add more useful things before. And I'm sure you too. ;) Anyone coming in a Early Access game expecting a fully polished and finished game is a little bit idiot or misinformed. It's a chance SM is enjoyable in...

I get it but I don't remember where and when I saw it :oops:

Just when I began to think there will be no one stupidly over-reacting... :rolleyes: