Search results

I love the idea of clickable coordinates. Though I'd rather have the option of whether it opens the map or simply sets the coordinates. Perhaps a little box opens with 2 buttons when a link is clicked. For faction members, I think the way it's set up now is a list view, so I don't see...

Point well made. lol

This would be useful for more than just admins. For example, on the server I play on, we have "BUILD" sectors. What the admins do is lock a person into a sector far away from the main universe and then give them creative mode. I imagine the admins may give the ability to /remove_entity...

Hello. So this idea is to make the build helper select a block exactly like how the create docking has you select where the core will go. The reason I suggest this is because many times I want to create a shape over an area that already has a docked entity, and right now I have to undock...

Have you seen how many threads in the suggestion forum are for fuel? Now, I don't know if every server will utilize this to make a more "fuel" type system, but I think many servers would like to play with it anyhow, to help make bases stronger, giving more regen and capacity to bases perhaps...

No, docked reactors are only useful up to the 2m power cap. Why would you want less efficient power reactors? It's all about weight for power. The concept is this, up to the power cap it may only take a few thousand power reactors to get to 2m, but to get to 4m, it takes tens of thousands. If...

Ok, so this idea is to double or triple the range of the rail docker and to also give it a "wide beam" option, which is used when right clicking. The wide beam would allow a person to shoot a beam that grabs rails using a 3x3 area (or perhaps larger even, like 5x5), rather than 1x1. The reason...

I don't like the idea of having to manually prime each one. I think they are most useful in swarms of small sacrificial drones, and this would completely make that worthless by making it far too difficult to manage. How about this? They start unarmed. If you connect an activation block to...

1. Static Movement: Ok, so this is an idea which I think would help make navigating around the map a lot easier (M key). Basically, I'd like there to be a "Static Movement" button, which would make it so that "E" ALWAYS goes up toward the positive sectors vertically. Q, down. "A" toward...

Hello. So I looked around and opened a LOT of threads regarding home base protection suggestions and did not see this one, so if I missed it, I apologize. But here are the ideas.. 1. Give home base protection diminishing returns based on the total size of a base, including docked entities...

I like this idea. I had just posted one actually, since I didn't find this one when doing a search. I think that at first they could simply put creative mode on in the test sector, and then later on make it save the entity to the shipyard design when you leave the test sector.

Ah, I had searched but did not find that one. The guy's original idea was a bit different, but then the consensus seemed to match what I posted here. Thanks for pointing me to an existing thread. I'll +1 it! :)

So this idea is to simply give creative mode in the shipyard test sector, so that players can test their ships out in real-time, while building in creative mode, on a multiplayer server, using the multiplayer server settings. Why, you might ask? A lot of people move to single player creative...

Well, it would just be a setting in the server config. The default settings would be for it to act as it already does. There would just be the option for a person to implement different values for bases and ships. (I think the same could also be done for weapons, shields, etc.)

You're right! Derp derp, I'm an idiot. lol

I like this idea as well, though regular rail could still have 0 speed when there's nowhere for an entity to go. The speed would, of course, resume to normal if a block next to it changed to be a pathway for whatever is on the rail to move. This would also fix all existing ships, and would not...

Basically you could set the filter to remove ALL block types, except 1. So a player might choose NOT to remove rail turret axis, but to remove all other block types. Or perhaps it could be expanded further, and allow players to select multiple block types not to remove, ie, all rail types...

I wonder, did you ever test this kind of config out?

That type of planet would be pretty awesome to have in StarMade. Though I really want to know what it looks like when digging down toward the center. How do they solve that issue? Hmm

Haha, well first I need to see if there's another thread out there with this suggestion already, but if not, I will post it. :)