Search results

I would say that the hull detailing is too uniform... They are all squares, and placed too regularly. They should be placed at irregular intervals, but with some sort of plan. There should be variances to reflect the nominal systems that should be beneath the hull. An example of this might...

not bad! not bad at all!

Love the update! One question: Can you limit construction to shipyards? Now that we have another option, can we turn off a ship's advanced build mode magic?

I think that the "scanner breaking" feature of the jammer is very OP indeed. Remember that turrets wont (I think) fire at a jammed target. Just make it so that the player does not show up on radar (or to antipersonnel turrets) as long as he has the jammer in his hand after he has activated it...

What if you just set them up in a linking system, like weapons currently are? System + Othersystem + optional support Just a thought.

Sounds like something that can be abused maliciously in combat.

you know what cloakers REALLY should run? 100% overdrive support on missile + beam combo. Huge range, massive first strike capability, missiles outrun point defense, and the long cool-down doesn't matter when you just re-cloak and run afterward. Fight your ship like a SUBMARINE man...

I would not mind seeing cloaking use energy based on the ship's overall "score" wherein ships with a lot of weapons, armor, and shields could not easily cloak, while ships willing to give up most of that could cloak at any size. With the ship score system coming, I don't see how this would be...

This is rather grusome, but I think the game could use "corpse" blocks, that come in pairs. Dead astronauts for spooky decor. Chairs? We need to be able to do more with the display screens: I would like to be able to link them together to make one big screen.

I want to again drop an idea that I have been championing: Derelict Ship Spawns I want to see ships with various (randomly generated) damage that spawn in void space and asteroid fields. These should be "Derelict" just like the stations, and you must use credits to remove the derelict status...

WHAT was that Colonel thinking? While "Massed" units are indeed the best for combat, that does NOT mean shoulder to shoulder! Optimal spacing for massed armor is 50-100 Meters, hull down whenever possible. That is as close together as you EVER want your tanks to get. Additionally, WHERE...

-1 for core block. Not needed, or wanted, especially on stations.

Why not just have a separate mode for torpedoes to RAM enemy ships? I have been asking for it for years!

I think I agree that the game mechanics tend to favor (right now) making a ship that can do nearly everything, but I also think that modifications to the base game that add systems of buffs or pre-determined roles is the wrong way to go about this. Simply by adjusting the values for engine...

This is a shipbuilding game. The stats of your ship should be entirely determined by what YOU (the shipwright) builds, not by what someone else dictates. If you want more missiles, build more missiles. If you want more shields, build more shields. Things like bonuses for having the right...

+1 Too many stations in void space!

Not installation ready, this turret uses push pulses to fire small warhead armed projectiles. This is to test feasability for larger ships, and may potentially be used on an RP server. in testing, I find that the rounds often go off in the barrels unless you remove the wedges from the inside...

yep yep quite rare, say 1/1000

I want to see damaged and powered down ships spawning as asteroids on rare occasions!

Make the players wait through the full "boot up" timer before their ship comes back under control.