Search results

I like how you contradict yourself in your last 2 posts in the first one you say stations are so bad they need to be constantly defended in the second you say stations are fine because they can have station only blocks. Let me tell just clear this up for you, station only blocks don't make...

not that it would matter if you have unlimited space in the grid you can create complicated circuits using what we do have and be none the worse for wear

I've never had the issue of turrets not spawning although usually my entity count on things i use my shipyard for is less than 20 idk if that makes a difference or not.

but his idea has absolutely nothing to do with piercing astrobeams nd while i have read that thread and it may have turned into more than a astro beams should pierce blocks thread there would be no way to know that from looking at the title, maybe you should instead be telling people who want to...

balance is tough i'm kinda in the same boat I know that something feels wrong about the way things are but its like reaching through air you know i just can't wrap my head around a balanced idea to fix them.

I think you missed my point with this post which is understandable i was pretty tired and not clear on what i meant. What i meant was that since there is no real "reason" to have support ships( can't replace damage blocks on the fly astrotech useless) (no way to get a shield regeneration bonus...

the power supply beam is supposed to be a logistics supply weapon used to support ships being focused in combat rather than having the ships do damage themselves, i suppose maybe at one point it was supposed to be the only way to power large ships is if you had smaller ships boosting you up. The...

first let me start with my point about the block id's block ids are used for new blocks this is true but i feel like this falls into the same line as if say a new cannon block was added that did the exact same thing as the old cannon block but they left the old cannon block in cause so many...

i think part of the problem is your system is kinda complex and you have a serious wall of text going on usually when you get no responses its because people couldn't be bothered to read all the way through it and cannot therefore give you an opinion on your suggestion one way or another as they...

how bout this then missile/jump gives you another "lock on missile" this one however is slightly different it moves at normal server speed for 10 seconds maybe 15 seconds and then "jumps" into the target basically simulating a missile that is fired and then has its own very short range(basically...

You might not know this if you haven't taken psychology classes but people actually like to be screwed over, it gives them a reason to stand back up gives them something to work towards, and overall makes the average mundane human being feel like life is worth living if they have obstacles to...

the only problem with this is it puts us in a catch 22 you literally take up a new block id and remove a decortive block aka (increase its mass to that of a system block) all so that people don't have to use docked reactors to get extra power, however this brings in new vulnerabilities to a ship...

the last mechanic you talked about is already in place thrust to mass ratio is not easy to maintain and in fact when was the last time you had a fully fitted ship bigger than say a corvette that had more than a idk 2:1 thrust to mass can it be done ..... sure but thrusting takes power i know on...

and for the exact reasons you stated ship a would have the advantage over ship b weapon travel time. assuming ship a is moving at its maximum speed lets say 150 m/s and ship b can move at 300 meters per second both ships have an engagement range of lets for ease of numbers say 5000 meters ship a...

how would a better built ship lose to a crappy ship just because it was faster? If both parties have the same engagement range then every time the crappy ship came in to use its weapons the better ships turrets would fire and the crappy fast ship which is made even crappier by the fact that it...

Ok so basically what ur saying is ship a and ship b have the same engagement range but ship b is faster ( i feel like if ship a is slower tha ship b, ship a has less damage than ship b, and ship a's shields can't keep up with ship b's shield and somehow ship b managed to have higher thrust to...

There will be renewable resources in starmade It just can't happen overnight yes it is trying to have to deal with all of these problems that the game has now, no being in alpha isn't justification for a game to have any and all issues (this issue however is / was one that was alpha acceptable )...

In a 1v1 Situation the outcome is the same someone using a jump inhibitor just needs to make sure they have more jump drives than inhibitors its that easy if your ship normally needs 20k jump drives and you wanna put on 20k inhibitors then you just double the number and you can jump inhibit the...

We really just need planets to become renewable resources while asteroids get increased mineral value for The problem was what they didn't complain about the asteroid size was saved every server save so if you knew what you were doing you could go to an asteroid apply 20k cannons 20k shield...

The same can be said of all the weapon combos pretty much we already had cannons why did we need cannon cannons that fire faster but have the same dps...... because it adds OPTIONS the same way that having cannon beam is pretty much like having just cannon but a little different gains range...