Search results

Amazing work. Take the next picture with a brighter background and maybe the sun shining on it. I want to see the details a little bit easier.

Hi kids how is it going!!! Okay, today, as I think that you all never got laid, here something, so you don't have never no chance at all. I think that's unfair, even for unpolite people like you guys are, so here you go. Actually I just was like "whatever screw you guys", here have some...

Hello fellows. I hereby want to inform you that Space Bear Machines recognises your declaration of war. As we see that we have a totally underwhelming enemy as our foe, we at least want to give you a little present from time to time. We now start shitposting this or that video, to give you some...

In the beginning, the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.

The humanly disguised reptilian queen is really behind it all.

anything new in dev.278?

9 reactor blocks...well tbh. I would not design ships around this guiding block count. They might change it, and then you build your fleet around the idea of 9 rb as fighter size for your hangars and suddenly they change it to 18. ;) But I love the idea, that there could be a common consensus...

Anything new in the .277 dev-build?

I think a big problem of factions is, that people tend too stay in their old one for too long. So you can't reqruit guys easily that are actually in a semi-inactive faction fearing to loose their old faction, even though it wont be active for the next few weeks.

Yeah, true. Colored blocks should be manufactured easier. Maybe only one block in grey for the hull and armor types, that can get color selected for the whole spectrum via a menue.

Why do you think spagetti is a meta type, that should be compared to the upcoming meta? What's about the actual common metas with power maxing, self powered turrets, ion hardened shields, ion weapons that get unslaved when shields break, and docked hull? I am just currious, why you think, that...

I totally forgot this point. The devs mentioned it once in a blog. Somewhat counters the argument, that the new power was an unneccessary delaying addition.

Please complain about lazyness contstructive next time: Just post the bloddy threads, if you state that the information is so easy to find. I can't find the corresponding threads too, and every other new reader as well. Thank you all.

The current and upcoming meta depends first of all, on the size of ships you bring into battle. Did booth parties agree on a limitation or is it only about size? Current meta had something with high shield cap, 5% regen, and going to max power. In the end a battle was usually won by the ship...

Add missions and campaigns, also the ability to mod in your own universe with own ships and stations. Change small fighters and weapons to actually be hurtful to bigger ships. Remove insanths.

"Most of its mechanics will already be done by the time the power update is out and should make it likely to release both updates within this year. We definitely want to start to work on the universe update in 2017 still, and we are excited to share the details with you right after the weapon...

Anything new in the .273 pre-build?

And here we have it again, 2x funny ratings and disagree-spam for no reason. Ofcourse people don't bother anymore talking about power, when people are like that. This pool can be placed where the sun never shines.

Yeah, ofcourse, assumptions are not helping. On the other hand it's allways good to guess a little around the vote results. =) I am just worried, that people take 60% votes against stabilizers too serious, and push each other further.