Search results

Actually, you just gave me an idea, which somewhat stems off of what Elite: Dangerous does. What if you had to go into the menu and select the ship option, which would then display an option titled "Docking." Selecting this would then display a list of all nearby (within the sector)...

Actually, after speaking with DukeofRealms the issue was sorted out and the deletions were undone. As a matter of fact, even he feels that these kinds of punishments for Tier I offenses are too harsh. If you want to see what he said, here is his response: Need a brief review or explanation of...

I second this opinion. I think it's a hassle to go through the menu just to switch reactors. Plus, it might be nice to just press a button from your engine room in your ship to automatically switch from Reactor A to Reactor B.

If I could like this 1000 times, I would. Fleet docking and any sort of auto docking would really come in handy (and what we already have really needs a lot of work). The thing about it is defining syntax and working out the actual code. If I were to suggest a syntax, I would probably suggest...

I'm glad this was resolved smoothly. I agree that the Tier I punishments are unreasonably harsh, and could very easily brew up some discontent. Your suggestion for three 0 point preliminary warnings also sounds like a good plan. As for derailing, it is a problem at times, and a still-viewable...

I am fairly new, but I also know that no developer would release a game when part of it is still incomplete. You do need to remember that Starmade is still in alpha. You can't compare it to a full game yet.

Ouch. Those are some heavy penalties. I think your suggestion for 4, 5, and 6 faces works, but -8 for 1 touching face (and I'm assuming -10 for 0) would kill the integrity pretty quickly. Of course, it may work really well. What we really need is extensive testing and tweaking. We'll never...

God mode, I don't need to be, so long as I got the statements from a knowledgeable and reliable source. I'm not a spokesperson for the devs, nor am I representative of them. You don't need to take the things I say seriously because I actually have no credibility; but I take these things from...

Is there reason not to? I haven't heard of him having a history of telling lies. There's a difference between not saying something and saying something that isn't true. And when it comes to not saying anything at all, how do you think the community would react if Schema came out and said, "We...

I have to call you on that one. In a discussion with Lancake, he actually stated that he wanted to do the bonus from the very beginning, and was only waiting on the bonus because he couldn't figure out how to construct it. It wasn't until last week that he finally managed to develop the...

It doesn't necessarily need to go. It just needs to look good. From the private conversations I've had, the devs are very open to suggestions on how to improve the aesthetics of the streams. In fact, instead of demanding they be removed, why not just make a post about ways they could be...

I just want to warn you to be careful with your wording. A lot of people are going to take the word, "disagree," the wrong way. I saw the main reason for the moderation overhaul to be addressing a lot of the hate speech and unproductive posts that have been floating around. Pre-move...

Starmade memes In the linked thread above, DukeofRealms deleted a few posts yesterday that strayed off-topic. At first I thought the action was to be expected after seeing that it had been taken, but after reviewing the latest dev post, which states, "Additionally, we no longer delete most...

Just reread the dev posts and realized something. Duke may have actually been overstepping some boundaries with the deletion. "Additionally, we no longer delete most rule violating content (Tier II and below). Instead, a notice is displayed on the content stating the rule it breaks (or broke)...

Can you provide some screenshots of that? It sounds strange and could be a bug.

Have you mentioned that in the support section? I'm sure the mods would be happy to help you figure out what's wrong. And if it's not something you're doing and there really is an issue with the mechanic, create a bug report.

Actually, I know what you're talking about here because I had one of my posts deleted, too in that thread. Duke had nothing against you in particular. If you look at the reason, it says it was because we all went off-topic. We started talking about moderation in the general SM discussion...

If you look at the Frequent Suggestions Megathread, you will see that this is actually already planned. If I had to guess, it may be coming in the universe update. If not, it would probably be really late in development when there wouldn't be much left to add or change that could potentially...

You're not the first one to come up with this idea. I've heard it from other people, too. But think about it. Which would you rather have: a redirectable stream (let's ignore the aesthetics because those can be fixed) or a good few thousand conduit blocks snaking throughout your ship...

The devs want this game to turn out well, too. A lot of people like to hate on the things that break their builds and aren't conducive at the moment, but the devs often know what they are doing. I'm sure it was difficult to figure out a decent fix for the unidirectional advantage stabilizers...